By Dwight L. Carlson
"The
only army that shoots its wounded is the Christian army," said the
speaker, a psychologist who had just returned from an overseas ministry
trip among missionaries. He summed up the philosophy of the group he
worked with as:
1. We don't have emotional problems. If any emotional difficulties appear to arise, simply deny having them.
2. If we fail to achieve this first ideal and can't ignore a problem, strive to keep it from family members and never breathe a word of it outside the family.
3. If both of the first two steps fail, still don't seek professional help.
I
have been a Christian for 50 years, a physician for 29, and a
psychiatrist for 15. Over this time I have observed these same attitudes
throughout the church—among lay leaders, pastors, priests,
charismatics, fundamentalists, and evangelicals alike. I have also found
that many not only deny their problems but are intolerant of those with
emotional difficulties. Many judge that others' emotional problems are
the direct result of personal sin. This is a harmful view.
At
any one time, up to 15 percent of our population is experiencing
significant emotional problems. For them our churches need to be
sanctuaries of healing, not places where they must hide their wounds.
THE EMOTIONAL-HEALTH GOSPELSeveral years ago my daughter was battling leukemia. While lying in bed in the hospital, she received a letter, which read in part:
Dear Susan,
You do not know me personally, but I have seen you in church many times….I have interceded on your behalf and I know the Lord is going to heal you if you just let Him. Do not let Satan steal your life—do not let religious tradition rob you of what Jesus did on the cross—by His stripes we were healed.
You do not know me personally, but I have seen you in church many times….I have interceded on your behalf and I know the Lord is going to heal you if you just let Him. Do not let Satan steal your life—do not let religious tradition rob you of what Jesus did on the cross—by His stripes we were healed.
The
theology behind this letter reminded me of a bumper sticker I once saw:
"Health and Prosperity: Your Divine Right." The letter writer had
bought into a "healing in the Atonement" theology
that most mainstream evangelicals reject. According to this traditional
faith-healing perspective, Christ's atonement provides healing for the
body and mind just as it offers forgiveness of sins for the soul. The
writer meant well, but the letter created tremendous turmoil for my
daughter.
While evangelicals have largely rejected "health and wealth" preaching—that
faithful Christians will always prosper physically and financially—many
hold to an insidious variation of that prosperity gospel. I call it the
"emotional-health gospel." The emotional-health gospel assumes that if
you have repented of your sins, prayed correctly, and spent adequate
time in God's Word, you will have a sound mind and be free of emotional
problems. Usually the theology behind the emotional-health gospel does
not go so far as to locate emotional healing in the Atonement (though
some do) but rather to redefine mental illnesses as "spiritual" or as
character problems, which the church or the process of sanctification
can handle on its own. The problem is, this is a false gospel, one that
needlessly adds to the suffering of those already in turmoil.
This
prejudice against those with emotional problems can be seen in churches
across the nation on any Sunday morning. We pray publicly for the
parishioner with cancer or a heart attack or pneumonia. But rarely will
we pray publicly for Mary with severe depression, Charles with
incapacitating panic attacks, or the minister's son with schizophrenia.
Our silence subtly conveys that these are not acceptable illnesses for
Christians to have.
The
emotional-health gospel is also communicated by some of our most
listened-to leaders. I heard one national speaker make the point that
"At the cross you can be made whole. Isaiah said that 'through his
stripes we are healed' … not of physical suffering, which one day we
will experience; we are healed of emotional and spiritual suffering at
the cross of Jesus Christ." In other words, a victorious Christian will
be emotionally healthy. This so-called full gospel, which proclaims that
healing of the body and mind is provided for all in the Atonement,
casts a cruel judgment on the mentally ill.
Two
authors widely read in evangelical circles, John MacArthur and Dave
Hunt, also propagate views that, while sincerely held, I fear lead us to
shoot our wounded. In his book Beyond Seduction, Hunt writes,
"The
average Christian is not even aware that to consult a psychotherapist
is much the same as turning oneself over to the priest of any other
rival religion," and, "There is no such thing as a mental illness; it is
either a physical problem in the brain (such as a chemical imbalance or
nutritional deficiency) or it is a moral or spiritual problem."
MacArthur, in Our Sufficiency in Christ, presents the thesis that
"As Christians, we find complete sufficiency in Christ and his provisions for our needs."
While I agree with his abstract principle, I disagree with how he narrows what are the proper "provisions." A
large portion of the book strongly criticizes psychotherapy as one of
the "deadly influences that undermine your spiritual life." He denounces
"so-called Christian psychologists and psychiatrists who testified that
the Bible alone does not contain sufficient help to meet people's
deepest personal and emotional needs," and he asserts, "There is no such
thing as a 'psychological problem' unrelated to spiritual or physical
causes. God supplies divine resources sufficient to meet all those needs
completely." Physically caused emotional problems, he adds, are rare,
and referring to those who seek psychological help, he concludes: "Scripture hasn't failed them—they've failed Scripture."
A PLACE FOR PROFESSIONALSWhen adherents of the emotional-health gospel say that every human problem is spiritual at root, they are undeniably right. Just as Adam's fall in the garden was spiritual in nature, so in a very true sense the answer to every human problem—whether a broken leg or a burdened heart—is to be found in the redeeming work of Christ on the cross. The disease and corruption process set into motion by the Fall affected not only our physical bodies but our emotions as well, and we are just beginning to comprehend the many ways our bodies and minds have been affected by original sin and our fallen nature. Yet the issue is not whether our emotional problems are spiritual or not—all are, at some level—but how best to treat people experiencing these problems.
***********************
Original Sin Or Epigenetics
Since there are innumerable passages of Scripture that clearly and
unambiguously tell us that no person can bear the guilt (or innocence)
of another, but will answer for their own sins and misdeeds and that our
eternal destiny is determined by our conduct, not by inheritance, ...we
can not simply accept that we are sinners because Adam sinned. But, on
the other hand, what we can not ignore is that Paul does make a direct
connection between the sin of Adam and the fallen condition of the
entire race. In Romans 5 Paul seems to be saying that something happened to all humanity because of Adam’s sin. Which begs the question… What exactly was it that Adam passed down to his descendants?
***********************
Many followers of the emotional-health gospel make the point that the church is, or at least should be, the expert in spiritual counseling, and I agree. Appropriate spiritual counseling will resolve issues such as salvation, forgiveness, personal morality, God's will, the scriptural perspective on divorce, and more. It can also help some emotional difficulties. But many emotional or mental illnesses require more than a church support network can offer.
I
know it sounds unscriptural to say that some individuals need more than
the church can offer—but if my car needs the transmission replaced, do I
expect the church to do it? Or if I break my leg, do I consult my
pastor about it? For some reason, when it comes to emotional needs, we
think the church should be able to meet them all. It can't, and it isn't
supposed to. This is why the emotional-health gospel can do so much
harm. People who need help are prevented from seeking it and often made
to feel shame for having the problem.
Thankfully,
more and more people in the Christian community are beginning to
realize that some people need this extra help. If professionals and
church leaders can recognize the value of each other's roles, we will
make progress in helping the wounded. Forty percent of all individuals
who need emotional help seek it first from the church, and some of these
will need to be referred to mental-health professionals. Church leaders
should get to know Christian therapists in their communities so they
can knowledgeably refer people with persistent emotional problems.
DEPRESSED SAINTSLurking beneath the stigma that many Christians with mental and emotional problems face is a simple question: Can a Spirit-filled Christian have emotional problems? The emotional-health gospel overlooks the record of the Bible itself and church history, just as health-and-wealth gospels must ignore the history of not-so-rich saints (not to speak of Jesus himself).
The Reformer who penned "A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,"
Martin Luther, in 1527 wrote: "For more than a week I was close to the
gates of death and hell. I trembled in all my members. Christ was wholly
lost." According to Luther's famous biographer, Roland Bainton, Luther
found himself "subject to recurrent periods of exaltation and depression
of spirit." Luther himself had written that "the content of the
depressions was always the same, the loss of faith that God is good and
that he is good to me."
The
famous preacher Charles Spurgeon, who lit the fires of the
nineteenth-century revival movement, struggled so severely with
depression that he was forced to be absent from his pulpit for two to
three months a year. In 1866 he told his congregation of his struggle:
"I am the subject of depressions of spirit so fearful that I hope none
of you ever get to such extremes of wretchedness as I go [through]." He
explained that during these depressions, "Every mental and spiritual
labor…had to be carried on under protest of spirit."
In
the Bible we find that Moses, Elijah, Job, and Jeremiah suffered from
depression, often to the point of being suicidal. Elijah's miraculous
victory over the prophets of Baal in 1 Kings 18 is followed in the next
chapter with Elijah despondent and trembling with fear: "And he was
afraid and arose and ran for his life…and sat down under a juniper tree;
and he requested for himself that he might die" (1 Kings 19:3-4; all
verses quoted from the NASB unless otherwise noted).
I've
heard Elijah here described as being a coward or accused of having a
grand old pity party. Such interpretations fail to see God's
compassionate response to his cry: "And the angel of the Lord came again
a second time and touched him and said, 'Arise, eat, because the
journey is too great for you' " (19:7). Far from criticizing him, the
Lord allows him to rest and twice sends an angel to feed him.
Job
cried out in the midst of his suffering, "I cannot eat for sighing; my
groans pour out like water…. My life flies by—day after hopeless day….I
hate my life…. For God has ground me down, and taken away my family….
But I search in vain. I seek him here, I seek him there, and cannot find
him…. My heart is broken. Depression haunts my days. My weary nights
are filled with pain…. I cry to you, O God, but you don't answer me'"
(3:23-24; 7:6, 16; 16:7; 23:8; 30:16-17, 20, LB). Notice that even with
his depression, the Bible says, "In all this Job did not sin" (1:22).
Moreover, God reproves Job's friends for accusing Job of sin and for
their "failure to speak rightly concerning my servant Job" (42:7-8).
So the answer to our question is a definite yes: Spirit-filled Christians can experience emotional problems.
Those
who adhere to the emotional-health gospel often believe that negative
emotions are in themselves sinful. We need to ask them how they account
for the displays of Christ's emotions. In the Garden of Gethsemane, he
"began to be very distressed and troubled. And He said to them, 'My soul
is deeply grieved to the point of death' " (Mark 14:33-34). Jesus, in
coming to earth, took upon himself the form of a human with all its
frailties, yet he did not sin.
Paul
writes with affirmation, "And I was with you in weakness and in fear
and in much trembling" (1 Cor. 2:3). Later he wrote, "We were afflicted
on every side; conflicts without, fears within. But God, who comforts
the depressed, comforted us by the coming of Titus" (2 Cor. 7:5-6).
Consider
this thought experiment. Give me the most saintly person you know. If I
were to administer certain medications of the right dosage, such as
amphetamine, thyroid hormone, or insulin, I could virtually guarantee
that I could make this saint anxious with at least one of these agents.
Would such chemically induced anxiety be explained as a spiritual sin?
What if the person's own body had an abnormal amount of thyroid hormone
or insulin and produced nervousness? I have seen patients in this
precise predicament.
While
the church should never condone willful sin, it must learn to accept
that people within it may suffer from emotional symptoms that are not
the result of personal unconfessed sin, as many proponents of the
emotional-health gospel suggest. We must take seriously Paul's
injunction to "encourage the fainthearted, help the weak, be patient
with all men" (1 Thess. 5:14).
CALLING WOUNDS SCRATCHESWhich brings us to the heart of the problem with the emotional-health gospel. Followers of the emotional-health gospel often have a nave understanding of the nature and cause of mental illness. Is mental illness always due to sin? Can people cure themselves by doing or thinking the right things? What role do chemicals and genetics play? What part can good, biblical counsel have in restoring people? How we answer these questions will dramatically skew how we deal with those suffering emotional problems.
It
is tempting for people experiencing everyday stress and its
accompanying anxiety or depression to think that those with severe
emotional problems feel much the same as they do—only a little worse.
After all, isn't depression merely feeling blue or down, and anxiety
just plain worry or nervousness?
One
minister writing on depression stated that he was "depressed" for
several days after a property contract had failed. He wrote, "As a basic
rule I never sympathize with depressed people…. These people have
already pitied themselves excessively, thus generating their depression.
What they need is help, which comes by gently getting them to see that
they are indulging in self-pity." From the experiences of the many
patients I have observed, I strongly doubt this author has experienced
or understood clinical depression.
Recent
studies of more than 11,000 individuals found depression to be more
physically and socially disabling than arthritis, diabetes, lung
disease, chronic back problems, hypertension, and gastrointestinal
illnesses. The only more disabling medical problem was advanced coronary
heart disease. And the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
reports that individuals who have suffered both emotional illness and
cancer report that their emotional illness caused them the greater pain.
Deep
depression is not just self-pity. The level of anxiety of those with
generalized anxiety and panic attacks is significant even during sleep.
If you can imagine the anxiety of being on a hijacked airplane and
seeing several co-passengers shot, you can begin to grasp the level of
anxiety some people suffer for days at a time. Even people with moderate
clinical depression (dysthymia) feel pain on their best days.
From
a research perspective, the emerging answer to what causes emotional
illness involves three components: nature (one's biological, chemical,
and genetic makeup), nurture (environment, circumstances, teachings),
and personal choice (which can but does not necessarily include sinful
choices). Not uncommonly, the cause is a combination of all three of
these.
While
research into these matters is still in its infancy, some conclusions
are already clear. Any paradigm that judges all mental illnesses to have
the same cause (whether it be "sinful choices" or chemical imbalances)
is too simplistic. We are a complicated and dynamic amalgam of body and
spirit, nurture and nature. Any attempt to reduce our holism dishonors
the Craftsman who made us.
Let
me provide some examples of how these factors interact. More than a
decade ago I experienced a severe depression caused by an external
event: a patient for whom I cared very much committed suicide. For over
three months a devastating sense of doom kept me feeling desperate and
hopeless. I forced myself to socialize, exercise, and think on positive
things. I spent additional time in the Word and in prayer. But I
couldn't shake the depression until I asked for the help of a colleague.
A circumstance in life (nurture) had thrown me into a tailspin I
couldn't handle any more than I could a car out of control. At the
height of my depression, I am sure my brain chemistry was affected.
Still, God chose to preserve me through talking with a colleague, which
had the effect of restoring me emotionally and, theoretically,
chemically.
While
my depression had been triggered by an outside circumstance, Marty's*
was the result of a physical cause. A popular Big Ten athlete and a
committed Christian, he encountered his first major depression the year
after college. While at times he experienced tremendous highs, other
times it took incredible effort for Marty to get up in the mornings, go
to work, play with his young children, or go to church.
He
was afraid of discussing his problem with friends because he believed
it was a symptom of sin. He prayed, struggled, asked God to forgive him,
and looked for what God might be teaching him. The only answers he
heard from conference speakers and church leaders were prayer and
confession. He wondered if demons caused his affliction.
When
his problem was diagnosed as a physical one—bipolar disorder—I started
him on lithium. The results produced an emotional stability that has
lasted to this day—12 years so far. He is very active in his church and
is involved in discipling a number of young men. But because of the
stigma, only his wife and I know of his condition or that he is taking
medication.
A
number of studies point to a genetic origin of bipolar disorder. They
show that while close relatives and the second fraternal twin have a 15
percent probability of acquiring the disease, the second identical twin has a 75 percent chance of acquiring it.
While
Marty's illness had an internal cause, it resulted in external
behaviors. The same is true for the cure. Does the physical cause of his
illness mean that he was not responsible for his behaviors? No. We all
have to stand before God for what we have done. Yet independent of what
one does, we know that a person with a bipolar disorder is helped by
chemical therapy.
Pat*
provides an example of the inadequacy of a rigid physical/spiritual
distinction and of the interplay between nature, nurture, and personal
choice. A vivacious 23-year-old secretary, she had been extremely
healthy until her car blew a tire on a busy but unfamiliar Los Angeles
street. When she noticed the graffiti on the walls and people of another
ethnic group who seemed to be watching her every move, she grew
frightened. Subsequently, whenever she drove more than a few miles from
home, dreadful panic attacks ensued. She feared, she said, she would "go
Loony Tunes" or die. These attacks soon began to control her life, even
when she was in "places that were perfectly safe." She also began to
withdraw socially.
Her
agoraphobia, as this kind of fear is called, had occurred in her family
before. Her maternal grandmother and an aunt had experienced panic
attacks, and her mother was afraid to ride elevators. As Pat sat in my
office for her first appointment, she asked, "What is the cause of these
attacks—physical or mental?"
"The
answer is both," I told her, explaining that these factors cannot
easily be separated. Studies show that 7 percent of the population
develop panic attacks (with or without agoraphobia) during their
lifetime, and 25 percent among those with close relatives with the
problem. Which raises the question: Does agoraphobia run in families
because of genes or environment?
In
1946, it was observed that patients with panic attacks often have an
intolerance to heavy exercising. Researchers found that during exercise
the body normally produces the chemical sodium lactate, but at higher
levels in those who suffered from panic disorders. In 1967, Ferris Pitts
injected sodium lactate intravenously into individuals prone to panic
and found that the injection usually brought on attacks similar to the
patient's worst attacks. The fact that individuals not subject to panic
disorders in the first place did not develop attacks when given the
sodium lactate pointed to a chemical difference in the individuals who
experienced the panic attacks.
A
later study showed that if patients with panic attacks were given
certain medications, such as an antidepressant or a benzodiazapine
tranquilizer, they greatly decreased or prevented panic attacks from
developing when the sodium lactate was later injected. These are the
medications we now use to help individuals such as Pat.
Interestingly,
doctors also discovered that telling their patients to relax in order
to relieve their anxiety usually did not work. In fact, for six out of
ten patients, trying to relax actually brought on a panic attack.
With
this medical evidence, it is obvious that we cannot attribute such
panic attacks to wrong thinking or choice alone; there are clear
underlying biological and chemical factors. The latest research shows
that in anxiety disorders, the nerve endings overfire and excite the
brain with chemicals called catecholamines. Medications we use to treat
anxiety help reduce this overfiring to a normal level.
So
what caused Pat's panic disorder? Her history suggests a very strong
genetic-biological vulnerability to develop panic attacks. The fact that
her grandmother and mother often communicated their fears to Pat while
she was growing up points to a developmental influence, as does her
learned fear of neighborhoods painted with graffiti and populated with
people of a different ethnicity than her own. The threatening experience
of being stuck on that unfamiliar street provided the environmental
trigger that precipitated her first attack.
Besides
nature and nurture, a third part of the equation—personal choice—must
be factored in to understand her attacks fully. Her later avoidance
behaviors (such as not driving far from home) decreased Pat's panic
attacks for a time, but they also allowed her fear to fester and grow.
Even after we talked about how avoidance can make panic worse, and I had
encouraged her to take steps to counteract it, she had a hard time
following through on the assignments. She also continued to feed her
fears with the notion that she was going crazy. Such "catastrophizing"
often leads to a debilitating fear of having panic attacks. Since
agoraphobia increasingly incapacitated her, I recommended some
medications that often help. To date she has refused them—another
choice.
So
are Pat's problems caused by sin? If her pastor tells her simply to
trust in the Lord, to pray more, and to meditate more on Scripture (all
of which is generally very good advice), have we really understood or
helped Pat with her problems?
WHAT THE WOUNDED NEEDAn issue of Moody magazine several years ago addressed the debate over Christian counseling. A number of writers took a strong stand against it. But Joseph M. Stowell, president of Moody Bible Institute, offered the balanced view I am arguing for. He said, in part:
There is often a need for well-trained counselors to lead the broken to healing.
Does that mean the Scripture and the Spirit are not sufficient? No….
While
much that is taught and practiced in secular counseling is unbiblical,
it is also true that there are many helpful insights to be gleaned from
this field….
We
live in a season when life is increasingly complex and the fragility of
precious souls is demonstrated by growing brokenness and complicated
conflicts. We dare not waste their sorrow on the battlefield of careless
counsel that violates biblical parameters or with simplistic,
unqualified solutions that plunge them ultimately into deeper despair.
What
the emotionally wounded need is for the body of Christ to be a place of
love, acceptance, encouragement, forgiveness, and compassion. They need
a place where Christ is lifted high and God's Word is never compromised
but also where there is openness to use all available methods of
healing that are not contrary to his Word. This kind of environment will
not only foster emotional growth, but it will make this healing effort a
spiritual service pleasing to God.
Dwight L. Carlson, M.D., is the author of several books, including Why Do Christians Shoot Their Wounded? (IVP), from which this article has been adapted. He lives with his wife in Torrance, California.
No comments:
Post a Comment